Wealth Club

Subtitle

Blog

view:  full / summary

My cheating husband just inherited $3 million: Should I still divorce him?

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Dear Moneyist:

My husband recently inherited a big sum of money when his father passed away. His father left 75% of his estate to my husband, which is worth around $3 million. My husband has been having an affair for some time now. I will confront him about it soon, and after that, I intend to divorce him.

What rights do I have to his inheritance? We have five children together and I went through a lot with him for many years and I want to punish him for going behind my back and having an affair. I know I’m a bitter and scorned wife, but what are my rights with his inheritance?

Lucy in Delaware

Dear Lucy:

Ten U.S. states have community property laws where assets acquired during a marriage are divided 50/50. Delaware, however, is not one of them. It’s an “equitable distribution” state, meaning you both get what a judge deems fair and appropriate. In Delaware, a divorce court would likely divide the assets based on what is fair and equitable. However, your husband would likely keep his inheritance if the money is not co-mingled as inheritance is not typically considered marital property. Given that you have borne him five children and, from what I can glean from your letter, have endured some bad behavior, you still have a good case for at least 50/50 of what remains.

That said, Delaware also takes anticipated inheritances into account when dividing assets — so even if your husband has not received his money and he keeps all $3 million inheritance — it could still be a factor deciding how much you both walk away with in the event of a divorce. (If I were advising your husband, I’d say keep the paperwork.)

Related video: More Americans Relying On Inheritance For Retirement (provided by CBS Los Angeles)

Click to expand
UP NEXT

UP NEXT

In Delaware, you could receive more of the marital property if you can prove that your husband was cruel or unfaithful, and whether there is a big gap in your wealth and earnings after you divorce. Your age differences and health may also play a part. (Other states like California are what’s known as “no fault” divorce states, meaning bad behavior does not necessarily result in larger payouts.)

Talk to a lawyer. Then talk to your husband. Ask him, “Are you having an affair?” If he says no, present him with your evidence. Tell him that you raised five children together and you both did the best you could for many of those years and that it’s time to be honest with each other now and, despite what has happened during your marriage, say you owe it to yourselves to show respect to the people you were when you first met. Bring him back to the moment he proposed and tell him that you want to end this marriage with the same dignity and respect that you brought into it. It’s not good to remain in a marriage where you are resentful and unhappy.

Take heart: You’re not the only person who has written about marital infidelity. This unfaithful and soon-to-be-divorced partner lamented the financial consequences of his decision. There will always be a reason to wait. Don’t be like this acrimonious couple. Start the process today, if you are sure you want to divorce him. The rest of your life awaits.

Do you have questions about inheritance, tipping, weddings, family feuds, friends or any tricky issues relating to manners and money? Send them to the Moneyist and please include the state where you live (no full names will be used). 



Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/my-cheating-husband-just-inherited-dollar3-million-should-i-still-divorce-him/ar-BBP3YLo?srcref=rss

Flipkart captures 51% market share in festive sale, says report

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

In the recently concluded 5-day festive season sale, Flipkart captured highest market share at 51 per cent, driven by sales in mobiles and fashion categories. Amazon's market share for the same period stood at 32 per cent, with the rest of the e-commerce industry accounting for 17 per cent, reveals a report from RedSeer Consulting, a research and advisory firm focused on the consumer internet market.

“E-tailers generated their highest ever sale performance over the five festive days generating Rs 15,000 crore in GMV or $2.3 billion in sales (at $1=Rs 65) compared to $1.4 billion generated in 2017 sale, registering a year-on-year growth of 64 per cent. Flipkart accounted for more than half of the GMV for the entire industry. Between just Flipkart and Amazon, the share is 62 per cent and 38 per cent respectively” said Ujjwal Chaudhry, Engagement Manager, RedSeer Consulting. A week before the festive sale began, RedSeer had forecast sales of $2.5 - $3 bn for the industry.

Despite large investments by both Flipkart and Amazon in supply chain and affordability initiatives like debit card EMIs, Consumer Electronics lagged behind expectations and grew by only 45 per cent, while fashion and smartphone categories grew by 78 per cent and 70 per cent respectively.

The second day of the five-day festive sale was the biggest in terms of GMV as it saw the launch of multiple new exclusives in mobile phones and offers on other platforms as well. After the second day, GMV growth slowed down a bit with the last three days of the sale accounting for only 42 per cent of sales compared to 60 per cent in the first two days. Last year's GMV for the entire sale period was surpassed by the end of the second day.

“Sixty four per cent growth compared to last year bodes well for the industry. Mobiles and Consumer Electronics continue to account for more than 75 per cent of festive sales. This year saw higher participation by fashion shoppers which made it the fastest growing vertical” observed Chaudhry.

However, Flipkart's CEO Kalyan Krishnamurthy, in a statement said “We have recorded over 70 per cent share of the entire Indian e-commerce market, matching the scale of global marquee retail events. We pushed the boundaries on many fronts and hit some of our biggest-ever numbers. From selling 1 million mobile phones in the first hour of sale to establishing Flipkart as India’s fashion hub, we demonstrated our position as market leader with no clear competition.”

Amit Agarwal, Senior Vice President and Country Head, Amazon India said “We have received an overwhelming response to the fifth Great Indian Festival, with sales in the first 36 hours nearly surpassing entire first wave last year and the event exceeding our most aggressive plans across all categories. With 3x times surge in Prime member sign-ups across the country, more than 80 per cent of new customers coming from small towns and orders from 99 per cent of serviceable pin-codes in just 4 days, we are humbled that Amazon.in is trusted by India to find, discover, and buy anything online.”



Source: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/flipkart-captures-51-market-share-in-festive-sale-says-report/article25258134.ece?_escaped_fragment_=

Comparing a Few Popular Gold Plays This Year, the Past Two Years, and in the 2016 Gold Rally

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Comparing GLD and PHYS, we see that their performance is fairly close to the performance of gold itself.

In the decline of this year there is more 'slippage' in PHYS as compared to GLD, by about 100 bp.

But in the gold rally of 2016, PHYS outperformed GLD by almost 60 bp.

If  we run a comparison over a two year period to date, which includes a decline - rally - decline the price of gold, we see the spread between PHYS and GLD widen to a more substantial 228 bp.

And that is an even more substantial slippage of 334 bp compared to the price of gold itself.

There is a 'premium' in PHYS as compared to Gold and GLD that expands and contracts depending on the bullish temperament of the market.

I have included two more charts back from 2010 that shows this.

And then there are the miners.  I have included two charts with the large cap gold miners GDX below.

Just a quick glance at those charts clearly shows the leverage, or beta with regard to the underlying asset which is gold, in the miners.

The gains are significantly greater, but the declines are also much larger.

I am merely providing the data here for you to consider.  If you don't know what to do with it, then it probably is something you ought not to worry about.

There are other things to consider of course, including security, fees, storage, the purpose of the asset in your portfolio, and the time horizon for which you are holding it.







Source: https://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2018/09/comparing-few-popular-gold-plays-this.html

Income tax return filing for FY 2018-19 begins; ITR-1, 4 forms available for download

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

NEW DELHI: You can now start filing your income tax returns (ITR) for the last financial year 2018-19 with the Income Tax department issuing ITR forms 1 and 4 from today.

"ITR 1 & 4 for AY 2019-20 is available for e-Filing. Other ITRs will be available shortly," the I-T department said on its website.

ITR-1 (Sahaj) and ITR-4 (Sugam) forms can be downloaded from the income tax e-filing website and also used for filing your tax returns online.

ITR-1 form is meant for resident and salaried individuals having total income of upto 50 lakh while ITR-4 form is for businessmen and individual professionals having total income of upto 50 lakh. HUFs and firms (other than LLP) having total income of upto 50 lakh can also use this form for ITR filing.

Both the ITR forms are however not meant for individuals who are either director in a company or has invested in unlisted equity shares. The I-T department has said that this has been done in a bid to clamp down on shell companies and check routing of black money.

Directors in both listed and unlisted companies will have to file their tax returns in ITR-2. It will also be mandatory for them to disclose details like Director Identification Number (DIN), Permanent Account Number (PAN), equity holding along with the names of the companies.

You also need to keep in mind that it is now compulsory for all those filing ITRs to mention Aadhaar number in the forms without which the tax returns will not be processed.

A PTI report had earlier said there has been no change in ITR-1 or Sahaj form but some sections in ITR 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 have been rationalised.

The last date for filing ITR is July 31 for those who are not required to get their accounts audited.

It is advisable to start filing your tax returns as soon as possible to avoid any penalties for delay and also to get early tax refunds.

In 2017-18, the Income Tax department added 1.07 crore new taxpayers while the number of ‘dropped filers’ came down to 25.22 lakh. A total of 6.87 crore ITRs were filed during FY 2017-18 as compared to 5.48 crore ITRs filed during FY 2016-17, the department said.




Source: https://www.livemint.com/money/personal-finance/income-tax-return-filing-date-form-2019-download-itr-1554791827903.html

Forget Fake News, Trade In Fake Goods Hits Half A Trillion Dollars

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Authored by Alex Kimani via SafeHaven.com,

Black-market traders have increasingly been tapping into an invisible network to funnel  a wide range of goods into global markets right under the noses of customs and border protection agents—to the tune of over $500 billion.  

All of the merchandise —- including luxury designer wares such as Chloé ankle boots, Chanel Le Boy bags, Saint Laurent wallets or chic Ray-Ban shades - are not authentic brand-name products but inexpensive replicas that are undeniably, shamelessly fake.

And they now command a half-trillion-dollar market that’s expanding at astronomical rates.

The market for counterfeit goods has reached alarming proportions, powered by tech-savvy traders lurking in dark corners of the internet.

According to a report by the European Union’s intellectual property office (EUIPO) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the market for illicit goods has grown by over 100 percent over the past decade, with counterfeits accounting for 3.3 percent ($590 billion) of international trade in 2016 compared to $250 billion in 2008. Interestingly, the surge came against a backdrop of falling global trade volumes.

China leads the way

The report was compiled by analyzing thousands of customs seizures, with footwear, clothing, leather goods and IT equipment topping the list of the most frequently seized imported fakes.

(Click to enlarge)

Source: The Guardian

The report also reiterated another well-known trend: China, by far, remains the biggest source of fake goods. China was the main source of counterfeit products in 9 out of 10 categories tracked by the trade watchdogs with as many as 27 percent of seized goods being traced back to the country. Other leading offenders include India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Turkey, Thailand and Vietnam.

Interestingly, the latest fake goods report seems to closely mirror another 2016  independent report titled: Social media and luxury goods counterfeit: a growing concern for government, industry and consumers worldwide that was published in the Washington Post.

Both reports identified the explosive growth in online technologies as a key reason for the proliferation in the trade in counterfeit goods.

Many counterfeit sellers are technology-savvy and use instant messenger apps such as Telegram or Whatsapp that provide end-to-end encryption to hide their nefarious activities.

They are also adept at using fake accounts, spam bots or deploy botnets to avoid being flagged by internal security systems and post thousands of images on a daily basis. If an account is exposed and blocked by Instagram, it often reappears under a new profile name sometimes in a matter of hours.

Buyers of luxury goods, beware: luxury products seem to be the category most heavily targeted by sellers of these scam products.

According to the Washington Post report, as many as 20 percent of 750,000 Instagram posts about top fashion brands that they analyzed featured illicit products with Prada, Chanel, Fendi, Louis Vuitton along with Cartier and Rolex among the most affected luxury brands.

Overall, the internet acts as a ‘giant amplifier’ that provides an almost direct line that connects producers and consumers with no filters or barriers.

The hidden psychological cost

While the internet has no doubt played a big part in expanding the fake goods business, it’s highly likely that most buyers of counterfeit products do it the traditional way - from some backstreet vendor where they can see, touch, feel, smell and readily identify them as cheap knockoffs.

It has always seemed like the fashion industry was merely engaging in marketing rhetoric when it tells us that counterfeits are bad for us. Many people who knowingly buy fake goods do it in an attempt to polish their self-image—cheaply and through deception. Yet, studies have shown that such people could be biting off more than they can chew—by incurring a huge psychological burden that makes them feel compelled to cheat in other areas of life, too.

One such study by researchers from Harvard Business School, UNC Chapel Hill and Duke University published in Scientific American, makes for compelling reading.

So maybe it’s not just a clever ruse drummed up by makers of ostentatious goods. All those dudes rocking faux Prada belts and ladies swinging plastic Birkin bags might succeed in fooling everyone but themselves.




Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-25/forget-fake-news-trade-fake-goods-hits-half-trillion-dollars

Links 9/10/18

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

California’s succulent smugglers: plant poachers seed Asia’s desire for dudleya SCMP

Aquarius Rising New York Review of Books

16 of UK’s largest van fleets to go electric: 18,000 electric vans by 2028 Treehugger

Beyond Goop and Evil The Baffler

Florida police ‘use Taser on drunk and disorderly Royal Navy sailors’ on shore leave from £3bn warship Politico

For safety’s sake, we must slow innovation in internet-connected things MIT Technology Review

The Air Force is determining ‘the appropriate process’ for Elon Musk smoking pot The Verge

Burn, Baby, Burn

Firefighters battle to gain on blazes across Northern California San Francisco Chronicle

WISCONSIN’S FLOODS ARE CATASTROPHIC—AND ONLY GETTING WORSE Wired

Hurricane Alley

Hurricane Florence Expected to Rapidly Intensify; Serious Rainfall Threat for U.S. East Coast Weather Underground

CBS’s Moonves Toppled by Harassment Allegations, Redstone Clash Bloomberg

Russia

Space: Another frontier for the US-Russian rivalry CNN (The Rev Kev)

Moscow Has Upped the Ante in Syria Consortium News (furzy)

Syraqistan

Syria: Rebel-held areas bombed as Turkey reinforces outposts Al Jazeera

Iran Develops a $5 Billion Weapon to Fight Sanctions WSJ

China?

Why Beijing will sacrifice its middle class in trade war with Donald Trump SCMP (furzy)

India

Rupee Tumbles as Current-Account Deficit Widens to 5-Year High Bloomberg

Sweden

Swedish election: political uncertainty looms after deadlock Guardian

Brexit

Brexit: clash of the pygmies EUReferendum.com

Open warfare between top Tories over Boris Johnson ‘suicide vest’ jibe at May Independent

Democrats in Disarray

Booker heading to Iowa in October Politico

Waste Watch

Enormous amounts of food are wasted during manufacturing – here’s where it occurs The Conversation

Health Care

For new cancer treatments, less is more WaPo

Big Brother IS Watching You Watch

ARE NEW YORK’S FREE LINKNYC INTERNET KIOSKS TRACKING YOUR MOVEMENTS? The Intercept

At Stake in Lawsuit: What Can Bosses Access on Your Personal Devices? WSJ

Gunz

California Tries New Tack on Gun Violence: Ammo Control NYT

SEC halts trading in two cryptocurrency products, citing market confusion Reuters

Tariff Tantrum

Ford insists it won’t build Chinese-made car in US despite Trump tweet The Hill

Trade war fears scupper Volvo Cars initial public offering FT

Ports compete to build ‘white elephant’ gas terminal Handelsblatt

China Invites Top Wall Street Executives to Beijing, FT Reports Bloomberg

Class Warfare

‘Monster’ Turns Our Farmers into Serfs and Sharecroppers American Conservative

EU seeks new powers for money laundering crackdown FT

Under Trump, the jobs boom has finally reached blue-collar workers. Will it last? WaPo

Land of Forever Tomorrow The Weekly Standard

Public Employees’ Pay, Benefits and Rights Become Campaign Issues Governing.com

WILL THE REAL VOTER FRAUD CRIMINALS PLEASE STAND UP WhoWhatWhy.org

How Purdue’s ‘one-two’ punch fuelled the market for opioids FT

Net Neutrality

ISPs Engage In Last Gasp Bid to Derail California’s Net Neutrality Law Motherboard

Trump Transition

The Deceptive Contrast Between Trump and Kavanaugh The New Yorker (furzy)

Divided America of Trump era challenges ad industry France 24

White House expected to warn of sanctions, other penalties if international court moves against Americans WaPo

Trump waives millions in claims against Stormy Daniels in new fallout from illegal payoff LA Times

Imbalance in NATO spending between US and Europe is no accident Handelsblatt. A view from Germany.

Bob Woodward said Trump nearly provoked North Korea into war with a single tweet Business Insider

Antidote du Jour:

See yesterday’s Links and Antidote du Jour here.

This entry was posted in Guest Post, Links on September 10, 2018 by .

Post navigation



Source: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2018/09/links-9-10-18.html

Trump and Jamal Khashoggi— Saudi Arabia Has Been Bribing the US with Arms Sales for Years

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

This is Naked Capitalism fundraising week. 1027 donors have already invested in our efforts to combat corruption and predatory conduct, particularly in the financial realm. Please join us and participate via our donation page, which shows how to give via check, credit card, debit card, or PayPal. Read about why we’re doing this fundraiser and what we’ve accomplished in the last year, and our current goal, extending our reach.

Yves here. The uproar over the almost certain execution of Jamal Khashoggi is so disproportionate to the event that it’s become a proxy for something else in terms of the US-Saudi relationship. The post by Vijay Prashad makes the argument that Khashoggi went too far in defending his allies in the royal family who were opposed to Mohammed bin Salman, which led to his presumed execution, and that the US won’t do much about it due to the importance of the arms sales. While this is probably part of the equation, the US also has important air bases in Saudi Arabia. The US recognized that it was at risk of having the kingdom become unstable regardless of whatever the path of succession was after King Salman, who was well liked internally, decided to cede power. But Salman’s choice of MbS was contrary to tradition and expectations (57 year old Prince Mohammed bin Nayef would have been the new ruler under the usual protocol), setting factions in the royal family even more against each other. And MbS has consolidated power in an extremely heavy-handed way, by using corruption charges to arrest rivals and their allies and stripping them of assets. As Wikipedia noted:

The arrests resulted in the final sidelining of the faction of the late King Abdullah and MbS’s complete consolidation of control of all three branches of the security forces, making him the most powerful man in Saudi Arabia since his grandfather, the first King, Ibn Saud.

There are likely members of the US military apparatus who are sympathizers with the losers in the royal family power struggle But if what Wikipedia says is correct, MbS looks to have consolidated his position quickly and with a ruthless show of force.

It’s puzzling to see the press up in arms about Khashoggi, given that the US has been joined at the hip with the thuggish Saudis for decades. Informed reader input welcomed.

By Vijay Prashad, a writing fellow at the Independent Media Institute, chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He is also the author of Red Star Over the Third World (LeftWord, 2017) and The Death of the Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016), among other books. Originally produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute

By now, few doubt that Jamal Khashoggi is dead. It is most likely that the Saudi journalist—who once advised kings and billionaires—was killed by an interrogation team sent from Saudi Arabia to meet him in Turkey. If this was the case, then it is impossible for the hit on Khashoggi to have taken place without a green light from the Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman (affectionately known as MBS). The Saudi royal palace would have signed Khashoggi’s death warrant because he had turned on the kingdom he otherwise loyally served. Nothing in Jamal Khashoggi’s career suggested that he would become a dissident. But, MBS had consolidated power against the fragile balance within the royal family and he had arrested and humiliated Khashoggi’s friends, including Al Waleed bin Talal of Twitter and Goldman Sachs. Khashoggi’s dissent was the complaint of one fraction of the ruling elite against another. If he were an unknown Saudi blogger sitting in Virginia, fulminating for a miniscule readership, he would have been left alone. That he represented powerful interests inside the kingdom made it impossible for him to survive.

Saudi Arabia is in the midst of an internal review of the death of Khashoggi. Whispers from inside the kingdom suggest that the final report will say that this was a “rogue” operation, a word introduced into this incident by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump, who has bet a great deal on Saudi Arabia, has been caught flatfooted. He did not want this scandal. He thought that disavowing Khashoggi—because he was a permanent resident of the U.S. rather than a U.S. citizen—would make the case disappear. But it has not, largely because Khashoggi has close friends in Washington, D.C. (including colleagues at the Washington Post), because he is so well-connected inside Saudi Arabia, and because the Turkish government—which is in a long-term tussle with Saudi Arabia—will not let the matter drop. Even a substantial bribe from Saudi Arabia was rebuffed by Turkey. This news is not going anywhere.

Guns from Washington

Pressure came upon Trump to at least block U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia. But, Trump is a pragmatic man. He knows that this would do two things he cannot afford—it would show that the U.S. does not stand by its allies, who might then seek allies elsewhere, and it would jeopardize the massive arms deals that the U.S. arms manufacturers have signed with the Saudis. Buying arms from the United States has come into use in Saudi Arabia’s insane war against Yemen, but more than that it has always been an insurance policy, a way to recycle Saudi petrodollars into the U.S. exchequer through arms deals. Not many U.S. politicians—who have arms manufacturers in each district—would be willing to throw Saudi Arabia overboard as long as it buys weapons systems that it mostly never used. Given this situation, Trump quite rightly ignored calls to stop the arms sales—“I actually think we’d be punishing ourselves if we did that.”

Why say that Trump was right to do what he did? It was not only because Trump wanted to maintain the U.S.-Saudi relationship. It was largely because Trump’s industrial strategy relies upon weapons sales around the world. And this is not merely Trump’s strategy. This has been the industrial strategy of the U.S. ever since manufacturing began to escape U.S. shores from the 1970s and ever since the USSR collapsed and Russian weapons manufacturing deteriorated (a situation remedied only recently). It is worth pointing out that the U.S. has been the world’s largest arms exporter for decades. It is also worth pointing out that U.S. arms exports have increased astronomically since 2008; it was arms manufacturing that was the fulcrum of the U.S. recovery from the credit crisis. Twenty percent of U.S. arms sales go to Saudi Arabia, whose appetite for U.S. weapons has increased by 448 percent from 2008-12 to 2013-17. This monstrous relationship that deposits Saudi petrodollars into the U.S. in exchange for weapons benefits the U.S. financial markets and the arms manufacturers—two key fractions of U.S. capital.

In previous decades, the Saudis warehoused the arms, watching them rot and then be replaced with new arms. They were not buying arms as much as using the oil profits to underwrite the U.S. financial and arms industries. This was a Saudi bribe, an insurance policy, to the U.S. political class. It ensured that Saudi Arabia was a key ally of the U.S., and it bought the friendship of the U.S. politicians who made sure to shut down any conversation about human rights abuses inside Saudi Arabia—and the very fact that it is a monarchy. U.S. presidents often talk of Saudi Arabia as an ally in the promotion of democracy, a witheringly bizarre tone that runs from liberal Democrats to arch-conservative Republicans.

Trump has been ferocious in his arms dealings. In the first half of 2018, the U.S. sold as many weapons as it did in all of 2017. This will be a record year. It is fated to continue in this vein. Arms will flow not only to Saudi Arabia, but to other Arab states, parts of the world that need to dry out from war rather than be put in the position where the gun becomes the solution to any problem.

Saudi Arabia’s Vietnam

Now, Saudi Arabia is using the arms sold to it by the U.S. and the UK in its barbarous war against the people of Yemen. Last year, Khashoggi made it clear that “when Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen erupted in March 2015, there was widespread Saudi popular support for it—including by me.” Khashoggi believed that Saudi Arabia must go to war to beat back an Iranian threat—an illusionary story that the Saudis had been flogging since the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Two years into the war, Khashoggi said that the humanitarian crisis in Yemen—entirely the fault of Saudi Arabia—had “badly damaged” the kingdom’s reputation, and it had weakened Saudi Arabia’s credibility. Khashoggi called upon MBS to recognize all factions in Yemen as legitimate and to get serious about peace. This advice fell on deaf ears. The deafness of the palace annoyed people like Khashoggi, many of whom had full sympathy for the goals of the Saudi campaign but saw it poorly executed.

There is a full-blown humanitarian crisis in Yemen. That is true. But there has also been quite fierce military resistance to the Saudi and UAE war against Yemen. Plucky Yemeni forces from many factions have not permitted the Saudis to feel safe for a major land invasion. They have been restricted—since 2015—to an aerial bombardment of Yemen, a destruction of its infrastructure that includes its crucial ports. Anyone who looks at the Saudi war in Yemen is quickly disgusted by its brutality, but they should also see the resistance of the Yemenis that has prevented the much-wanted Saudi victory.

But the Saudi war on Yemen has slipped off the radar. It was Khashoggi’s disappearance that captured the imagination—a macabre story of a man that many journalists knew. During the wall-to-wall coverage about Khashoggi’s disappearance and now murder, Cyclone Luban struck Yemen’s Al Mahrah governorate. Relief workers in the area say that the cyclone was very destructive and the governor of the province, Rageh Bakrit, tweeted photographs of the high flood waters. The “disastrous” conditions, Bakrit said, “surpasses our humble capabilities.” He wants help, but help cannot easily get there. The Saudi war prevents assistance. This is the fifth cyclone to strike Yemen since the Saudi bombing began. The war continues; children continue to die (five killed a day since the Saudi bombing began in March 2015). Nothing is going to stop that. Not Khashoggi’s critical column nor his death. Nothing—as long as Saudi Arabia pays those billions of dollar in insurance payments in the guise of arms purchases

This entry was posted in Banana republic, Energy markets, Guest Post, Middle East, Politics on October 18, 2018 by .

Post navigation




Source: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2018/10/not-just-trump-saudi-arabia-bribing-us-arms-sales-years.html

The Board, CEO Misconduct, and Corporate Culture

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Laurie Hays is Managing Director for Special Situations at Edelman. This post is based on a Edelman memorandum by Ms. Hays.

More than 400 business executives and employees including prominent CEOs have been accused of misconduct including sexual harassment in the last 18 months. In many instances, the resulting crises have fallen squarely in the lap of boards of directors. Clearly, it is time for boards to play a more active role overseeing corporate culture and conduct.

Investors increasingly view corporate culture as a risk factor. A new survey by Edelman finds that investors recognize the impact of a healthy culture and engaged employees on corporate performance. Nearly two-in-three investors surveyed believe maintaining a healthy company culture and enforcing a corporate code of conduct at all levels of the company impact their trust significantly in that company.

And an online poll by the National Association of Directors (NACD) revealed that almost half of directors said their board’s tendency to focus on known risks—those management already has identified—creates a major barrier to the board’s ability to oversee disruptive risks. Less than 20 percent expressed confidence in management’s ability to address such disruptive risks.

CEOs own company culture, to be sure. Case in point: When Lou Gerstner took over IBM in 1993, he sought to inject new thinking into the staid workforce. He sported blue rather than white dress shirts and growled at long presentations. Jerry York, his irascible CFO, used the F-word a lot. Almost overnight, IBMers discarded their white shirts and their use of transparencies (pre-PowerPoint). Several of their wives wondered why they started using profanity.

In this age of #MeToo, the stakes are higher than shirt colors and the F-word. Directors have every reason to worry about whether they are asking the right questions about culture and getting the full picture. “Boards need to be very clear about what they want to know,” maintains Margaret (Peggy) Foran, Prudential Financial’s chief governance officer and an advisor to several boards.

She says management increasingly must be held accountable for issues of corporate culture, whether it’s sexual harassment accusations, turnover rates, exit interview themes from departing employees and the like.

For part of her edification, Ms. Foran looks at Glassdoor, the website where current and former employees anonymously review companies and their management. There, she gets an unedited view of the middle ground and sees what types of complaints make their way online.

For most boards, asking a CEO whether they or other senior management have any conduct vulnerabilities proves uncomfortable. Hiring a private eye to spy on the C-suite doesn’t seem appropriate. Plus, loyal board members tapped by the CEO or friends on the board aren’t apt to identify problems. And many directors distracted by day jobs don’t have time do the work.

Certainly, some companies manage to figure out what’s going on without the media telling them. A recent example: Intel dismissed CEO Brian Krzanich after a probe into a relationship with an employee with the curt explanation that he violated the company code of conduct, and very little media attention has emerged since.

Other situations play out in the media because executives, including directors, don’t pay enough attention or take complaints and accusations seriously enough. A corporate press release that contends a company is seriously looking into a situation has to demonstrate action or the situation won’t be credible to employees, shareholders or customers.

Here are 10 best practices that can be embedded into a company playbook for turning the #MeToo moment into constructive reform before it turns into a major governance crisis for the board:

  1. Insert into the CEO’s performance and compensation metrics the need to cultivate a healthy, diverse culture where employees feel respected and real opportunities exist for promotion irrespective of gender or race. A summary at year-end of progress on the culture front should be included in the annual report for investors. It’s not personal, it’s mission-critical.
  2. Expect the board’s risk or audit committee to oversee culture just as it would oversee cybersecurity. The committee can receive quarterly reports on behavioral misconduct issues, pay and review promotions, and separation agreements with particular attention to “boy’s club” patterns. Also important: Diverse membership on the board’s risk committee.
  3. Establish a culture ombudsperson who reports to the board with a dotted line to help oversee Human Resources. As a credible resource for employees, many HR departments have been seriously damaged by #MeToo revelations because they didn’t act unless the CEO was on board. The ombudsman can receive complaints if victims are too afraid to talk to HR or management.
  4. Retain third-party experts to conduct regular and anonymous “climate” surveys that seek to determine how employees feel they are being treated. Make the survey results available internally and discuss them. If allegations arise, the outside parties should investigate them and report back to the board. Listen for any “rumor” mill because often where there’s fire, there’s smoke.
  5. Mandate in-person training for all employees on respectful conduct at work and decide how management will address issues that surface in the climate survey. Incorporate bystander training/peer feedback to thwart offensive behaviors. Bystander reporting can help directors grasp the extent of an issue, especially given what often is significant underreporting by victims.
  6. Provide directors, managers and the workforce with training into unconscious biases in the workplace—those learned stereotypes that are unintentional, deeply engrained and able to sway behavior—to address behavioral misconduct and to adjust their own lens.
  7. Employ strategic employee communications that don’t dance around the facts and that make clear management actually is addressing a situation seriously. Explain in detail how complaints are handled, including protections for victims and complainants, the range of disciplinary actions that can be taken and why outcomes generally are kept confidential.
  8. Provide confidential counseling services to employees who believe they can’t perform at their best because of what they are experiencing directly or observing around them.
  9. Listen carefully and consider outside help if the organization lacks women and/or minorities in senior management. While executive coaching is often provided for women and minorities to help them advance, coaching of white men and managers as well as a genuine desire to determine where star talent lies are even more essential for change to happen.
  10. Deeply implant the realization that a respectful workplace is the best step toward organizational success. If this is hard to appreciate, pretend a whistleblower has brought to the board’s attention the theft of millions of dollars from company coffers. That’s how much losing talented employees will cost in today’s tight labor market and fierce war for talent if such promising employees depart because they can’t bear to come to work or they file lawsuits for alleged discrimination, harassment or misconduct.

#MeToo is not vanishing. So, if boards don’t take heed, that reputation-damaging news article about a company’s or executive’s claimed misconduct could land in your inbox any day.



Source: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/01/12/the-board-ceo-misconduct-and-corporate-culture/

Mundo Digital: Conheça as principais novidades do novo iPhone

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Chegamos a mais uma de nossas colunas semanais sobre mundo digital, tecnologia e empreendedorismo.

Nosso destaque  são as novidades do novo iPhone que a Apple lançará no próximo dia 12 de setembro.

Saiba o que esperar do novo iPhone, que será anunciado no dia 12

A Apple anunciou o dia 12 de setembro como data para seu próximo grande evento, no qual espera-se que a empresa anuncie os novos modelos do iPhone – tradicionalmente, a empresa lançar o celular na primeira quinzena de setembro. Ainda falta uma semana, mas vários rumores já apontam quais serão as novidades. De acordo com a agência de notícias Bloomberg, os aparelhos vão atender uma faixa mais ampla de preços, ferramentas e tamanhos, para terem mais apelo no mercado, disseram fontes familiarizadas com o assunto. A Apple não confirmou as informações e só dará detalhes oficiais sobre os dispositivos no dia do evento.

Além do iPhone, é provável que a Apple anuncie no evento do dia 12 um novo Apple Watch, seu relógio inteligente, e também uma nova versão do iPad Pro. Abaixo, saiba o que esperar do novo iPhone da Apple – ou melhor, dos novos iPhones, no plural.

Três novos aparelhos

A expectativa é que a Apple lance três celulares. Um deles deve ser uma nova versão do iPhone X, que possivelmente será chamado de iPhone XS, com tela OLED de 5,8 polegadas. Um outro aparelho, o provável iPhone X Plus, deve ter tela OLED de 6,5 polegadas. Esse modelo também tem sido chamado por aí de iPhone XS Max. Por fim, o modelo mais barato, que deve ser a estrela do evento, terá tela LCD de 6,1 polegadas, segundo fontes. Ambos os dispositivos com tela OLED poderão ter duas entradas para chips SIM.

Cores

De acordo com o site 9to5Mac, o modelo mais barato do novo iPhone, com tela LCD de 6,1 polegadas, será lançado em várias cores, provavelmente cinza, branco, azul, vermelho e laranja. Além disso, o iPhone de tela OLED de 6,5 polegadas estará disponível nas cores preto, branco e um novo tom de dourado.

Reconhecimento de gestos

Os três aparelhos da Apple devem ter um novo sistema de reconhecimento de gestos, que surgiu inicialmente no iPhone X. Ainda seguindo a tendência do antecessor, os novos celulares devem ter Face ID, tecnologia que permite que os usuários desbloqueiem o celular apenas olhando para ele.

Memória

Segundo o site Engadget, os modelos de tela OLED terão 4GB de memória RAM – um avanço em relação aos celulares do ano passado, que tinham 3GB. O iPhone mais barato deve ter 3GB.

Preço

É esperado que o modelo mais básico, de tela LCD, custe entre US$ 699 e US$ 799. Os dois modelos com tela OLED, entretanto, devem custar a partir de US$ 999.

O iPhone mais barato. A versão mais simples do aparelho será feita em alumínio, ao invés do aço inoxidável, para baratear a produção, segundo rumores. Além disso, o aparelho não deve ter recursos como a câmera traseira dupla e o 3D Touch. Entretanto, ele deve ter o mesmo design geral que os outros dispositivos.

Tesla sofre novo abalo com saída de executivo e vídeo de Musk fumando maconha

As ações da Tesla sofreram sua maior queda em dois anos nesta sexta-feira (7), já que a empresa foi abalada pela saída de seu gerente de contas depois de somente um mês e pelas preocupações crescentes dos investidores com o comportamento do executivo-chefe, Elon Musk, que fumou maconha durante uma transmissão pela internet.

Os investidores da montadora de veículos elétricos estão tensos depois de um agosto tumultuado, durante o qual Musk propôs e depois recuou abruptamente de um acordo de privatização.

A Tesla disse que seu gerente de contas, Dave Morton, renunciou por estar incomodado com a atenção pública e com o andamento do trabalho.

Morton, cuja saída ocorre depois de a Comissão de Valores Mobiliários e Câmbio dos Estados Unidos (SEC) iniciar um inquérito sobre o plano abortado de Musk, engrossa uma lista de executivos que deixaram a Tesla recentemente.

A Bloomberg também noticiou nesta sexta-feira que o gerente de recursos humanos, Gaby Toledano, não voltará de uma licença depois de pouco mais de um ano no cargo.

Mesmo antes de Musk surpreender ao anunciar no Twitter no dia 7 de agosto que tinha um financiamento “garantido” para um acordo de privatização, a Tesla já estava sendo questionada por investidores, analistas e operadores de venda a descoberto no momento em que se empenha em atingir suas metas de produção e diminuir seus gastos.

Morton, que entrou na Tesla em 6 de agosto, foi citado em um documento da empresa nesta sexta-feira no qual disse que acredita “muito” na Tesla e que não teve desentendimentos com sua liderança a respeito de seu relatório financeiro.

Um quarto dos usuários do Facebook deletou o aplicativo nos EUA

Cerca de um quarto dos usuários do Facebook nos Estados Unidos deletou o aplicativo do smartphone no último ano, mostra uma pesquisa da Pew Research Center divulgada esta semana.

Além disso, mais da metade (54%) dos usuários com 18 anos ou mais afirmaram ter ajustado as configurações de privacidade nos últimos 12 meses.

Quatro de 10 usuários disseram que pararam de checar a rede social por diversas semanas; e 74% dos entrevistados responderam que tomaram uma dessas ações no último ano.

A pesquisa foi realizada entre o dia 29 de maio e 11 de junho, poucos meses após o escândalo com a consultoria Cambridge Analytica, que obteve dados de 87 milhões de usuários sem consentimento, por meio de um aplicativo que coletou dados de forma irregular.

O Facebook modificou sua política de dados e tornou as configurações de privacidade mais acessíveis aos usuários. Apesar disso, ainda sofre críticas por banir publicações políticas de conservadores nos Estados Unidos.

De acordo com o Pew Research Center, a grande maioria dos republicanos acredita que, de modo geral, as redes sociais censuram discursos do seu espectro político. Não há muita diferença, entretanto, entre republicanos e democratas. A relação com o Facebook esfriou em ambos os lados.

Entre as medidas que o Facebook adotou pós-Cambridge Analytica está a possibilidade de fazer o download de dados pessoais da plataforma.

A pesquisa identificou que apenas 9% das pessoas utilizaram esse recurso. Desse grupo, 47% deletaram o aplicativo e 79% ajustaram funções de privacidade.

Aviso: Os textos assinados e publicados no Dinheirama.com não representam necessariamente a opinião editorial do Blog. Asseguramos a qualquer pessoa, empresa ou associação que se sentir atacada o direito de utilizar o mesmo espaço para sua defesa. Também ressaltamos que toda e qualquer informação ou análise contida neste blog não se constitui em solicitação ou oferta de seu autores para compra ou venda de quaisquer títulos ou ativos financeiros, para realização de operações nos mercados de valores mobiliários, ou para a aplicação em quaisquer outros instrumentos e produtos financeiros. Através das informações, dos materiais técnicos e demais conteúdos existentes neste blog, os autores não estão prestando recomendações quanto à sua rentabilidade, liquidez, adequação ou risco. As informações, os materiais técnicos e demais conteúdos existentes neste blog têm propósito exclusivamente informativo, não consistindo em recomendações financeiras, legais, fiscais, contábeis ou de qualquer outra natureza.

Source: https://dinheirama.com/blog/2018/09/08/mundo-digital-conheca-as-principais-novidades-do-novo-iphone/

More Jobs, Less Pay

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

By choosing “I agree” below, you agree that NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic. This information is shared with social media services, sponsorship, analytics and other third-party service providers. See details.




Source: https://choice.npr.org/index.html?origin=https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/12/07/674764689/more-jobs-less-pay

Rss_feed